Authors: Yasuhiro Matsui, National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan; Shoko Oikawa, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
Abstract
Sonar sensor systems have been developed to prevent collisions between vehicles and surrounding objects by employing ultrasonic sensors mounted at the front of the vehicle. These systems warn drivers when nearby obstacles are detected. However, relatively few studies have examined the capability of sonar to detect humans. This study aims to clarify the human detection capability of front sonar sensors installed in two light passenger cars (LPC-I and LPC-II), one small passenger car (SPC), and one minivan (MNV). The LPC-I, SPC, and MNV were equipped with center and corner sensors, whereas the LPC-II had only corner sensors. Three volunteers—a child, an adult female, and an adult male—participated in the study. Human detectability was assessed using the “maximum detection distance ratio,” defined as the ratio of the maximum detection distance for a volunteer to that for a standard pipe. The results showed that both the center and corner sensors consistently detected front- and side-facing human volunteers. For front-facing human volunteers, the maximum detection distance ratios relative to the pipe were 99–101% (child), 93–101% (adult female), and 98–101% (adult male) for the center sonar sensor, and 99–102%, 94–102%, and 96–100% for the corner sensor. For side-facing human volunteers, the corresponding ratios were 97–100%, 92–97%, and 94–99% for the center sensor, and 95–99%, 91–98%, and 93–98% for the corner sensor. These detection ratios were closely aligned with those of the pipe. These findings suggest that front sonar sensors can effectively detect humans, indicating their potential to reduce low-speed vehicle collisions with nearby pedestrians.
![]()
Type: Full Paper, Technical
Keywords: Vehicle front sonar, human detection, pedestrian safety, initiation of forward movement
© Stapp Association, 2025
Access Additional Papers from This Volume
View additional Full Papers from the Stapp Car Crash Journal, Volume 69.
- Assessment of the Skull Fracture Prediction Capability of Finite Element Head ModelsAuthors: Clément Pozzi, Marc Gardegaront, Lucille Allegre, Philippe Beillas—Univ Lyon, Univ Lyon 1, Univ Eiffel, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622 Lyon, France…
- Development of a Generic Nearside Impact Test Fixture for Evaluating In-Vehicle Crashworthiness of WheelchairsAuthors: Kyle Boyle, Jingwen Hu, Miriam Manary, Nichole R. Orton, Kathleen D. Klinich—University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Abstract Current…
- Integration of Muscle Pre-tension and Activation to Evaluate Neck Muscle Strain Injury Risk during Simulated Rear Impacts Using a Finite Element Neck ModelAuthors: Matheus A. Correia, Stewart D. McLachlin, Duane S. Cronin—Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo Abstract Prevention…
- Investigation of Injury Risk Functions of THOR-AV 50th Percentile Male DummyAuthor: Z. Jerry Wang and George Hu—Humanetics Innovative Solutions, Inc. Abstract This research investigated injury risk functions (IRF) for the…
- Proposed Reformulation of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) Using Head Rotation-Induced Brain Injury Thresholds Simulated and Derived Directly from a Subhuman Primate Finite Element ModelAuthors: Dominic R. Demma, Ying Tao, Liying Zhang—Wayne State University; Priya Prasad—Prasad Engineering, LLC Abstract Recent studies have found that…
- Traumatic Head and Brain Injuries in Helmeted Motorcycle CrashesAuthor: John Lloyd—BRAINS, Inc Abstract This study presents an analysis of 364 motorcycle helmet impact tests, including standard certified full-face,…