Author: John Lloyd—BRAINS, Inc
Abstract
This study presents an analysis of 364 motorcycle helmet impact tests, including standard certified full-face, open-face, and half-helmets, as well as non-certified (novelty) helmet designs. Two advanced motorcycle helmet designs that incorporate technologies intended to mitigate the risk of rotational brain injuries (rTBI) were included in this study. Results were compared to 80 unprotected tests using an instrumented 50th percentile Hybrid III head form and neck at impact speeds ranging from 6 to 18 m/s (13 to 40 mph).
Results show that, on average, the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) was reduced by 92 percent across certified helmets, compared to the unhelmeted condition, indicating substantial protection against focal head and brain injuries. However, findings indicate that standard motorcycle helmets increase the risk of AIS 2 to 5 rotational brain injuries (rTBI) by an average of 30 percent compared to the unprotected condition, due to the increased rotational inertia generated by the added size and weight of the helmet. Advanced helmets performed, on average, about 5 percent better than standard certified helmets. Non-certified or novelty helmets offer inadequate protection against focal head and brain injuries, though they may offer some insight into rTBI protection.
The findings of this study also indicate a critical methodological deficiency in the oblique impact tests utilized in revised motorcycle helmet standards, including ECE 22.06, Snell M2025, and FRHPe-02, which fail to correctly assess rTBI risk. This paper provides recommendations for enhancing motorcycle helmet design to improve protection against rotational traumatic brain injuries.
Type: Full Paper
Keywords: Helmet; Brain injury; TBI; Rotational brain injury; Biomechanics; Motorcycle crash; Concussion; Diffuse axonal injury, Subdural hematoma; Head injury; Skull fracture
© Stapp Association, 2025
Access Additional Papers from This Volume
View additional Full Papers from the Stapp Car Crash Journal, Volume 69.
- Assessment of the Skull Fracture Prediction Capability of Finite Element Head ModelsThis content is restricted. Please log in to view it.
- Development of a Generic Nearside Impact Test Fixture for Evaluating In-Vehicle Crashworthiness of WheelchairsAuthors: Kyle Boyle, Jingwen Hu, Miriam Manary, Nichole R. Orton, Kathleen D. Klinich—University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Abstract Current…
- Integration of Muscle Pre-tension and Activation to Evaluate Neck Muscle Strain Injury Risk during Simulated Rear Impacts Using a Finite Element Neck ModelAuthors: Matheus A. Correia, Stewart D. McLachlin, Duane S. Cronin—Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo Abstract Prevention…
- Investigation of Injury Risk Functions of THOR-AV 50th Percentile Male DummyAuthor: Z. Jerry Wang and George Hu—Humanetics Innovative Solutions, Inc. Abstract This research investigated injury risk functions (IRF) for the…
- Proposed Reformulation of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) Using Head Rotation-Induced Brain Injury Thresholds Simulated and Derived Directly from A Subhuman Primate Finite Element ModelAuthors: Dominic R. Demma, Ying Tao, Liying Zhang—Wayne State University; Priya Prasad—Prasad Engineering, LLC Abstract Recent studies have found that…
- Traumatic Head and Brain Injuries in Helmeted Motorcycle CrashesAuthor: John Lloyd—BRAINS, Inc Abstract This study presents an analysis of 364 motorcycle helmet impact tests, including standard certified full-face,…